In 2017 I made the following donations:
Epistemic status: speculative
Choice is bad. I want to focus on one aspect of this badness: regret. I’m going to argue that increased choice predictably increases the amount of regret that an agent feels, even if they are actually better off, and that this is bad for humans in particular.
I read Kristen Roupenian’s excellent short story ‘Cat Person’, and had a really strong reaction to it - so here are some thoughts.
First, if you haven’t already, go read the story. Done? Good.
This post owes a great deal to prior work and thought by Spencer Greenberg, Eric Gastfriend, and Peter Hartree.
This post is a summary of the object-level thought on what makes a startup high impact which we developed while working on the Good Technology Project.
A lot of this material is more-or-less obvious applications of EA thought to startup theory. Nonetheless, it managed to be surprising and useful to people, so perhaps it is less obvious than it seems. I’ve condensed the presentation given the intended audience of this post - there is a lot more to say on many of these points. This material might have eventually developed into a “guide” to effective entrepreneurship.
In addition, some of the material relates to how to manage a startup in later stages. We never really got a chance to try that out, so it is especially speculative.
What makes a startup high impact?
We’re interested in startups because we think that they might be a mechanism by which we can have a large positive impact on the world. But what are the qualities that we should look for in a startup?
This document aims to be two things: a summary of the things that we learned from the Good Technology Project (GTP), and a post-mortem of the project itself.
I’m going to simply state my beliefs in this post, but I should clarify beforehand that I am not very certain about these, they are my current best guesses.
What was GTP?
GTP started in late 2015 when Richard Batty and I met up for coffee in Oxford. We ended up talking about entrepreneurship: both Richard and I were working in software, and we believed that entrepreneurship could provide a route to leverage our skills. But work on the concrete problem of how to actually do that was frustratingly sparse.